British Rule and the Freedom Struggle in Koraput District

0
51
British Rule and the Freedom Struggle in Koraput District

Introduction

The Koraput district, tucked away in the dense forests and rugged hills of southern Odisha, offers a striking contrast to the swathes of plains that dominate much of colonial India. Its terrain, tribal population, and historical trajectory contributed to a distinct and deeply rooted struggle against colonial rule. From early resistance by local rulers to mass tribal mobilizations during the Quit India Movement, Koraput’s story is one of resilience, valor, and a quest for dignity.


  1. Historical Background: British Rule Enters Koraput

Koraput’s history under colonial rule traces to the late 18th and early 19th centuries. After the transfer of the Northern Circars to British control by Emperor Shah Alam in 1765, the territory—including parts of today’s Koraput—became part of the Madras Presidency . The region fell under British indirect rule, largely through the existing Jeypore Zamindari, as formal colonial structures were limited due to its remoteness .

By 1823, the Kingdom of Jeypore came under British control; while the Raja retained some autonomy in tax collection, real power rested with colonial officials, who set up police stations and courts to assert control . In the mid-19th century, due to logistical difficulties and political caution, Koraput remained largely administrated through indirect means, with limited intervention from British codified law .


  1. Early Resistances: Tribal and Local Rulers’ Responses

From the beginning, several regional and tribal leaders resisted both the Jeypore administration’s subordination to the colonial regime and the British themselves.

3.1 Mukader Khara Malaya and Rani Khara Parvati

In the early decades of the 20th century, the Muthadar (tribal local chief) of Ghasaba, Mukader Khara Malaya, and his wife, Khara Parvati, emerged as formidable leaders against British expansion. Inspired by Vaishnavite faith and tribal traditions, Parvati continued resistance through guerilla tactics in the forests even after Khara Malaya’s death, harassing colonial forces from about 1900–1915 until her own capture and execution .

3.2 Bangara Devi, the Koya Princess

Simultaneously, Bangara Devi, a Koya princess of Malkangiri, led repeated insurgencies against the combined forces of the Jeypore state and the British. Revered as ‘Chandika’ by her people, she fought tirelessly until her defeat and arrest in 1880, leaving behind a legacy of strength and cultural memory .


  1. Freedom Movement Takes Shape: 1929–1936

Unlike many regions, Koraput became actively involved in the national freedom struggle relatively late—only around 1929, when recruitment of Congress volunteers began .

4.1 Salt Satyagraha, 1930

Under leaders like Radhakrushna Biswasray—encouraged by Gopabandhu Choudhury and even resigning from government service—Koraput joined the Salt Satyagraha of 1930. Many locals courted arrest under his guidance, marking the beginning of organized civil disobedience in the district .

4.2 Constructive Work and Training

The Gandhian ethos of constructive work found footing in the district. In December 1937, a training camp was inaugurated at Nuaput near Jeypore by Gopabandhu Choudhury, where trainers like Acharya Harihar Das and Gokulananda Mohanty prepared volunteers to mobilize across Koraput .

The struggle gained further momentum following Odisha’s formation as a separate province on April 1, 1936—Koraput now firmly inside a linguistically aligned political entity, aiding both administrative integration and nationalist outreach .


  1. The Quit India Movement and Tribal Uprisings of 1942

The Quit India Movement (August 1942) ignited a wave of defiance across India, and Koraput, although remote, saw some of the most fervent tribal mobilization.

5.1 Spontaneous Uprisings

As Congress organizations were declared unlawful and leadership repressed, villagers across Koraput engaged independently in acts of resistance—attacks on police stations, burning government offices, disrupting communication lines, and boycotting taxes .

5.2 Mathili Police Station Attack (August 21, 1942)

Laxman Nayak, also known as the “Gandhi of Malkangiri,” led a mass procession to Mathili police station. The police responded with lathi charge and firing—resulting in deaths and injuries. Alternative accounts mention varying figures, but the core remains: deadly colonial suppression met tribal assertion.

5.3 Papadahandi Firing (August 24, 1942)

Another brutal police firing occurred at Papadahandi on the banks of the Thuri (Turee) River. Police firing claimed numerous tribal lives and left many wounded. Some historians equate the violence to local-level mass killings akin to Jallianwala Bagh-style brutality .

5.4 Other Uprisings and Movements

The Quit India upheaval brought multiple movements across Koraput—from Umerkote to Gunupur, Padwa, Nandapur, and Nabarangpur—each named after its epicenter of revolt, collectively representing a district-wide tribal insurrection .

5.5 Martyrdom of Laxman Nayak

Following the Mathili incident, Laxman Nayak was falsely accused of killing a forest guard. He was tried, sentenced to death on November 13, 1942, and hanged on March 29, 1943, in Berhampur Jail . His death remains a potent symbol of tribal martyrdom.


  1. Other Prominent Freedom Fighters of Koraput

The Quit India Movement saw numerous tribal individuals emerge as leaders and symbols of resistance.

Rabi Singh Majhi and Baga Pujari from Umerkote participated in Individual Satyagraha in 1940–41 .

Sone Majhi (Dabugam), Madhab Pradhani (Papadahandi), and Neelakantha Gomango (Kujendri) also played critical local roles .

Radhakrushna Biswasray, instrumental in Salt Satyagraha, continued mobilizing until the Quit India wave .

These tribal leaders may not always find mention in mainstream history books, but their contributions remain deeply embedded within community memory.


  1. Legacy, Recognition, and Challenges Today

Despite their sacrifices, many tribal freedom fighters of Koraput remain little-known beyond local circles.

Efforts to commemorate Laxman Nayak—through observances and limited infrastructure development—exist, but long-term recognition and support for his family and followers remain inadequate . Many demand formal acknowledgment of other martyrs who fell in Mathili and Papadahandi but remain largely unnamed and forgotten .

Koraput’s historical contribution also serves as a reminder of how marginalized tribal communities, often excluded from educational and infrastructure development, nevertheless embraced the struggle for freedom with uncommon courage.


  1. Conclusion

The history of British rule and the freedom struggle in Koraput District is a compelling narrative marked by early tribal resistance, Gandhian-inspired mobilization, brutal suppression by colonial forces, and enduring stories of sacrifice and resilience. From Khara Parvati’s guerilla warfare to Laxman Nayak’s martyrdom, tribal communities resisted subjugation not only to preserve land and culture but to claim their rightful place in India’s national narrative.

Though physical remoteness contributed to relative historical obscurity, efforts to preserve and acknowledge these sacrifices continue. As Odisha and national historiography evolve, so does the imperative to include these tribal stories—ensuring that the freedom they carved is never forgotten.


Disclaimer

This article is intended for informational and educational purposes only. While the author has made best efforts to ensure accuracy, historical interpretation may vary and some local traditions and records may not be fully documented in existing literature. Sources included here are derived from secondary documents and archival summaries; readers are encouraged to consult primary historical documents or local institutional records for scholarly research or reference.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here