AI as a Tool to Counteract Anti-Innovative Scientific Systems – Elephant in the Lab

Aldoseri, A., Al-Khalifa, K., & Hamouda, A. (2024). AI-Powered Innovation in Digital Transformation: Key Pillars and Industry Impact. Sustainability, 16(5):1790 https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051790.

Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., … & Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 chi conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233

Azoulay, P., & Greenblatt, W. H. (2025). Does peer review penalize scientific risk taking? Evidence from NIH grant renewals (No. w33495). National Bureau of Economic Research. http:/doi.org/10.3386/w33495

Bai, X., Zhang, F., Liu, J., Wang, X., & Xia, F. (2025). Revolutionizing scholarly impact: advanced evaluations, predictive models, and future directions. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(10), 311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11315-6

Bianchini, S., Müller, M., & Pelletier, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in science: An emerging general method of invention. Research Policy, 51(10), 104604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104604

Bzdok, D., Altman, N. & Krzywinski, M. (2018). Statistics versus machine learning. Nature Methods 15, 233–234. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4642

Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S., & Bianchi, G. (2021). AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00703-8

Foster, J. G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312241560161

Fraser, N., Brierley, L., Dey, G., Polka, J. K., Pálfy, M., Nanni, F., & Coates, J. A. (2021). The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape. PLoS biology, 19(4), e3000959. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959

Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D., & Zou, J. (2018). Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16), E3635-E3644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720347115

Green, B., & Chen, Y. (2019). Disparate interactions: An algorithm-in-the-loop analysis of fairness in risk assessments. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 90-99). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.328756

Hanson, M. A., Barreiro, P. G., Crosetto, P., & Brockington, D. (2024). The strain on scientific publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 823-843. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00327

Joachim, M. V., Dodson, T. B., & Laviv, A. (2025). How Artificial Intelligence Differs From Humans in Peer Review. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.03.015

Kahneman, D., Lovallo, D., & Sibony, O. (2011). Before you make that big decision. Harvard Business Review, 89(6), 50-60.

Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence to support publishing and peer review: A summary and review. Learned Publishing, 37(1), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1570

Krenn, M., Pollice, R., Guo, S. Y., Aldeghi, M., Cervera-Lierta, A., Friederich, P., … & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2022). On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Physics, 4(12), 761-769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00518-3

Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2025). The Illusion of Quality Control: How Peer Review Enables Mediocrity While Suppressing Innovation in Academic Publishing (September 03, 2025). Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5436920

Liu, J., Wilkinson, C. E., Liu, X., Wang, M., & Cao, X. E. (2024). Revisiting “quantity” and “quality” of science from young scholars. Matter, 7(3), 715-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2023.11.018

Mabirizi, V., Katushabe, C., Muhoza, G., & Rugasira, J. (2025). A systematic review of the impact of generative AI on postgraduate research: opportunities, challenges, and ethical implications. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(1), 238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00495-3

Mavrogiorgos, K., Kiourtis, A., Mavrogiorgou, A., Menychtas, A., & Kyriazis, D. (2024). Bias in machine learning: A literature review. Applied Sciences, 14(19), 8860. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14198860

Messeri, L., & Crockett, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research. Nature, 627, 49 – 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.

Sourati, J., & Evans, J. (2023). Accelerating science with human-aware artificial intelligence. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 1682 – 1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01648-z.

Teixeira, A. L. (2025). AI in peer review: can artificial intelligence be an ally in reducing gender and geographical gaps in peer review? A randomized trial. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 10(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-025-00182-y

Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., … & Colomb, J. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6, 1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3

Toto, G., Grilli, L., Traetta, L., Villani, R., Petito, A., & Serviddio, G. (2025). Convergence of disciplines: a systematic review of multidisciplinary development approaches in artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1400338.

Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474

Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., Gao, W., Huang, K., Liu, Z., Chandak, P., Liu, S., Van Katwyk, P., Deac, A., Anandkumar, A., Bergen, K., Gomes, C., Ho, S., Kohli, P., Lasenby, J., Leskovec, J., Liu, T., Manrai, A., Marks, D., Ramsundar, B., Song, L., Sun, J., Tang, J., Velickovic, P., Welling, M., Zhang, L., Coley, C., Bengio, Y., & Zitnik, M. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620, 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2.

Wang, J., Veugelers, R., & Stephan, P. (2017). Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. Research Policy, 46(8), 1416-1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006

Webb, T., Holyoak, K. J., & Lu, H. (2023). Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9), 1526-1541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01659-w